The meteoric rise of mobile games and online wagering sites has sparked intense interest from developers, platforms, and investors seeking to capitalize on what has ballooned into a multibillion-dollar industry. However, those looking to break into the market should carefully weigh the legal and regulatory challenges that could accompany building business models around real-money games and betting. Before charging ahead, stakeholders should understand the critical distinctions between skill-based gaming and games of chance that could determine the legality of playing and hosting them.
In skill-based games, players pay an entry fee for the chance to win a prize, with outcomes that are meaningfully dependent on the relative talents of the competitors. Games of chance, on the other hand, are defined by randomness and probability, though standards vary from state to state. Some outright ban any element of chance, while others are more permissive as long as chance is not the predominant factor determining winners. Regulators may rule that games like poker contain enough skill components to fall outside gambling restrictions, while slot machines and roulette would likely fail such a test. These designations carry high stakes, as skill-based gaming faces fewer legal hurdles.
The gaming space intersects with a complex web of laws and regulations covering, among other aspects, how these products can be advertised, promoted, and presented to players.
State-level rules can impose strict requirements around transparency, odds disclosures, and responsible gaming practices. At the federal level, statutes like the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) further restrict how online wagering can be offered across state lines. And for mobile platforms and app stores looking to host real-money games, terms of service often prohibit any form of wagering without prior approval.
Navigating these intricacies is not easy, but the potential rewards of entering the gaming market make it an appealing prize. That is why developers should retain legal counsel intimately familiar with gaming laws and regulations nationwide. Experienced attorneys can help stakeholders mitigate risks in the earliest stages of conceptualizing and building new products. They can also advocate for sensible policies that don’t needlessly restrict innovation in this burgeoning industry. With sound legal advice, new entrants can thoughtfully weigh their options and make informed decisions.
Social media sites, search engines, and platforms that host real-money games are eager to cash in on other advertising revenue they can generate. They should remain cognizant, however, of the risks accepting these marketing messages can pose in terms of social backlash, regulatory scrutiny, consumer protection, and liability exposure should messages run counter to public policy in the jurisdictions in which they appear.
To avoid liability under federal and state laws, media, advertisers, and their advisors have increasingly required that game publishers provide a “reasoned legal opinion” assessing the legality of their offerings. This standard emerged from UIGEA, which mandates that banks and payment processors conducting transactions for gaming operations verify their legality. A reasoned legal opinion serves this purpose — a comprehensive analysis by a lawyer experienced in gaming law who evaluates whether the skill versus chance balance complies with statutes across jurisdictions where the game is accessible.
Specifically, the analysis delineates the game’s prevailing skill elements over chance. This includes strategic decision-making and knowledge application that govern outcomes more than random factors. A strong opinion will compare these dynamics to both federal definitions and individual state regs on permissible skill-based play versus prohibited gambling games. For multistate launches, each state’s gaming classification laws must be addressed.
The lawyer will use this full analysis to determine the game’s legal status. Given their liability risks, financial institutions place great weight on reasoned legal opinions in deciding whether to process payments. Similarly, major advertising platforms like Google and Facebook prohibit the promotion of illegal gambling products, relying on reasoned legal opinions in crafting ad policies on real-money games.
So, for game publishers, a reasoned legal opinion carries immense strategic import beyond mere legal compliance. It only requires a factual, good-faith assessment of the game. But it simultaneously unlocks financing channels and marketing avenues that can fuel growth. With so much at stake, retaining an experienced gaming attorney to conduct this review is a prudent necessity for real-money skill game operators. A well-crafted opinion can reassure partners, advertisers, and regulators that a venture complies with gaming laws — clearing the way for sustainable success.
Social media and online marketing platforms have adopted varied policies on advertisements for real-money games like online casinos, sports betting, poker, and other skill- or luck-based games. Facebook, Google, and Twitter prohibit marketing messages they deem to target minors and vulnerable populations.
Platforms that do allow such ads typically require advertisers to comply with local laws and regulations. Advertisers may need to implement age verification mechanisms or utilize advanced targeting options to exclude underage users. Social media policies also usually prohibit ads with unrealistic depictions of winnings that could mislead users. This includes suggesting financial success is guaranteed or implying players will make easy money through gambling games. Depictions of luxury living funded by gambling are also prohibited in most cases.
In addition, many platforms prohibit testimonials that imply wins are typical or exaggerate likely earnings. Some also ban ads containing puffery or unsubstantiated claims about a game’s fairness or odds. Anything misleading about the risks, rules, or probability of winning is generally prohibited.
